↓ Skip to main content

Preparation and evaluation of high-lignin content cellulose nanofibrils from eucalyptus pulp

Overview of attention for article published in Cellulose, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Preparation and evaluation of high-lignin content cellulose nanofibrils from eucalyptus pulp
Published in
Cellulose, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10570-018-1764-9
Authors

Martha Herrera, Kasinee Thitiwutthisakul, Xuan Yang, Pim-on Rujitanaroj, Ramiro Rojas, Lars Berglund

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 6 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Other 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 12 41%
Unspecified 8 28%
Chemical Engineering 4 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Chemistry 2 7%
Other 1 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2018.
All research outputs
#8,039,119
of 12,818,993 outputs
Outputs from Cellulose
#292
of 374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,149
of 270,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellulose
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,818,993 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.