↓ Skip to main content

Infraspinatus scapular retraction test: a reliable and practical method to assess infraspinatus strength in overhead athletes with scapular dyskinesis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
Title
Infraspinatus scapular retraction test: a reliable and practical method to assess infraspinatus strength in overhead athletes with scapular dyskinesis
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, June 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10195-010-0095-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giovanni Merolla, Elisa De Santis, Fabrizio Campi, Paolo Paladini, Giuseppe Porcellini

Abstract

Alteration of normal scapulohumeral rhythm due to the fatigue of scapular-stabilizing muscles induces decrease of rotator cuff strength. In this study we analyzed the interobserver and intraobserver realibility of the infraspinatus strength test (IST) and infraspinatus scapular retraction test (ISRT) in 29 overhead athletes with scapular dyskinesis, before and after 6 months of scapular musculature rehabilitation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 189 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 18%
Student > Bachelor 26 13%
Student > Postgraduate 19 10%
Researcher 17 9%
Other 15 8%
Other 46 23%
Unknown 41 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 43%
Sports and Recreations 29 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 50 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2023.
All research outputs
#6,770,175
of 24,133,587 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
#54
of 223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,039
of 99,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,133,587 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them