@mikejohansenmd @S_brimble @reverendofdoubt @bnallamo @mikejohansenmd , with respect of this issue, I recommend you this editorial’serie published in Intensive Care Medicine journal: (i) https://t.co/IrZpi4w6jf ; (ii) https://t.co/G6YpoT72tY ; and (iii) ht
RT @AlhazzaniW: Are #systematic_reviews and #meta_analyses still useful research? https://t.co/aGDvHExO5g
RT @AlhazzaniW: Are #systematic_reviews and #meta_analyses still useful research? https://t.co/aGDvHExO5g
RT @AlhazzaniW: Are #systematic_reviews and #meta_analyses still useful research? https://t.co/aGDvHExO5g
RT @AlhazzaniW: Are #systematic_reviews and #meta_analyses still useful research? https://t.co/aGDvHExO5g
RT @AlhazzaniW: Are #systematic_reviews and #meta_analyses still useful research? https://t.co/aGDvHExO5g
RT @AlhazzaniW: Are #systematic_reviews and #meta_analyses still useful research? https://t.co/aGDvHExO5g
RT @AlhazzaniW: Are #systematic_reviews and #meta_analyses still useful research? https://t.co/aGDvHExO5g
RT @AlhazzaniW: Are #systematic_reviews and #meta_analyses still useful research? https://t.co/aGDvHExO5g
@jaeschke3
RT @AlhazzaniW: Are #systematic_reviews and #meta_analyses still useful research? https://t.co/aGDvHExO5g
Are #systematic_reviews and #meta_analyses still useful research? https://t.co/aGDvHExO5g
RT @jtoanle: 3/3: Yes. https://t.co/z3MRZjRJfr
RT @pfanderson: Intensive Care Medicine April 2018, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 512–514 | Cite as Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still…
Intensive Care Medicine April 2018, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 512–514 | Cite as Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes Djillali Annane; Roman Jaeschke; Gordon Guyatt <https://t.co/s3UHBdzT9J> #sysrev
Sind systematische Reviews und Metaanalysen sinnvoll? Hier eine Pro/Con Diskussion Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/pEVH4QbX6w https://t.co/qLKF9bGehX... https://t.co/3rnZCd5Qnh
Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? https://t.co/IUFBuEaANp
RT @dr_mark_russell: Interesting series of articles in Intensive care Medicine. Are systematic reviews or meta-analyses still useful? Yes/N…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @dr_mark_russell: Interesting series of articles in Intensive care Medicine. Are systematic reviews or meta-analyses still useful? Yes/N…
Interesting series of articles in Intensive care Medicine. Are systematic reviews or meta-analyses still useful? Yes/No/Not sure #PedsICU @PICJournalWatch https://t.co/W0L0jCGgvl
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @DrTraceyK: Systematic Review: are you a lover or a hater? Thanks @HilThom123 for sharing. Rigorous methods will always be necessary! ht…
Systematic Review: are you a lover or a hater? Thanks @HilThom123 for sharing. Rigorous methods will always be necessary! https://t.co/ML4AIf21D0
Are systematic reviews still useful?Yes? No? Not sure? Get summary of differing views here. https://t.co/gcTuYfhpDu; https://t.co/jpDu2C3NT5; https://t.co/0q4EvT2ie7
RT @trished: The other parts of the debate (Ioannidis and Guyatt) are linked to: ‘For contrasting viewpoints, please go to https://t.co/A2…
RT @vawelch: Debate on future of #systematicreviews - and the need to improve adherence to standards such as following PRISMA and registeri…
RT @vawelch: Debate on future of #systematicreviews - and the need to improve adherence to standards such as following PRISMA and registeri…
RT @vawelch: Debate on future of #systematicreviews - and the need to improve adherence to standards such as following PRISMA and registeri…
RT @trished: The other parts of the debate (Ioannidis and Guyatt) are linked to: ‘For contrasting viewpoints, please go to https://t.co/A2…
RT @vawelch: Debate on future of #systematicreviews - and the need to improve adherence to standards such as following PRISMA and registeri…
RT @vawelch: Debate on future of #systematicreviews - and the need to improve adherence to standards such as following PRISMA and registeri…
RT @vawelch: Debate on future of #systematicreviews - and the need to improve adherence to standards such as following PRISMA and registeri…
RT @Geointheworld: Thanks to @trished for pointing out that a reply has been given! https://t.co/X5csTQ285V
RT @trished: The other parts of the debate (Ioannidis and Guyatt) are linked to: ‘For contrasting viewpoints, please go to https://t.co/A2…
RT @trished: The other parts of the debate (Ioannidis and Guyatt) are linked to: ‘For contrasting viewpoints, please go to https://t.co/A2…
RT @Geointheworld: Thanks to @trished for pointing out that a reply has been given! https://t.co/X5csTQ285V
„The alternative to using systematic reviews is simply not available“ https://t.co/Ksj1d36B1H
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes @ESICM https://t.co/BglDtbvASe
RT @trished: The other parts of the debate (Ioannidis and Guyatt) are linked to: ‘For contrasting viewpoints, please go to https://t.co/A2…
RT @vawelch: Debate on future of #systematicreviews - and the need to improve adherence to standards such as following PRISMA and registeri…
RT @vawelch: Debate on future of #systematicreviews - and the need to improve adherence to standards such as following PRISMA and registeri…
RT @trished: The other parts of the debate (Ioannidis and Guyatt) are linked to: ‘For contrasting viewpoints, please go to https://t.co/A2…
RT @vawelch: Debate on future of #systematicreviews - and the need to improve adherence to standards such as following PRISMA and registeri…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @vawelch: Debate on future of #systematicreviews - and the need to improve adherence to standards such as following PRISMA and registeri…
RT @vawelch: Debate on future of #systematicreviews - and the need to improve adherence to standards such as following PRISMA and registeri…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @MarkkuPeltonen: Hyvä väittely meta-analyysien ja systemaattisten katsausten hyödyllisyydestä, puolesta ja vastaan. Lehtien ja arvioijie…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @trished: The other parts of the debate (Ioannidis and Guyatt) are linked to: ‘For contrasting viewpoints, please go to https://t.co/A2…
RT @vawelch: Debate on future of #systematicreviews - and the need to improve adherence to standards such as following PRISMA and registeri…
RT @trished: The other parts of the debate (Ioannidis and Guyatt) are linked to: ‘For contrasting viewpoints, please go to https://t.co/A2…
RT @vawelch: Debate on future of #systematicreviews - and the need to improve adherence to standards such as following PRISMA and registeri…
Thanks to @trished for pointing out that a reply has been given! https://t.co/X5csTQ285V
Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? An interesting debate starring Guyatt 👉🏼 https://t.co/IrZpi4w6jf , Bellomo 👉🏼 https://t.co/Fttkm2ognO and Ioannidis 👉🏼 https://t.co/G6YpoT72tY CC @VinayPrasadMD @trishgreenhalgh @adamcifu @gio
RT @trished: The other parts of the debate (Ioannidis and Guyatt) are linked to: ‘For contrasting viewpoints, please go to https://t.co/A2…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @vawelch: Debate on future of #systematicreviews - and the need to improve adherence to standards such as following PRISMA and registeri…
RT @MarkkuPeltonen: Hyvä väittely meta-analyysien ja systemaattisten katsausten hyödyllisyydestä, puolesta ja vastaan. Lehtien ja arvioijie…
RT @trished: The other parts of the debate (Ioannidis and Guyatt) are linked to: ‘For contrasting viewpoints, please go to https://t.co/A2…
Debate on future of #systematicreviews - and the need to improve adherence to standards such as following PRISMA and registering an open-access protocol https://t.co/49aLG1ey9X
RT @trished: The other parts of the debate (Ioannidis and Guyatt) are linked to: ‘For contrasting viewpoints, please go to https://t.co/A2…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @steven_oliver: “Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? We are not sure” Reads to me like the good ones are,…
Hyvä väittely meta-analyysien ja systemaattisten katsausten hyödyllisyydestä, puolesta ja vastaan. Lehtien ja arvioijien tulisi ottaa huomattavasti kriittisempi linja näihin, nyt suuri osa huonolaatuista. https://t.co/7zC89fHJ6C
“Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? We are not sure” Reads to me like the good ones are, and the bad ones aren’t. #MBBS https://t.co/vA6kIs9ILn
RT @PWGTennant: 'Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research?' Great to see this being debated (in Intensive Care Medic…
RT @PWGTennant: 'Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research?' Great to see this being debated (in Intensive Care Medic…
'Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research?' Great to see this being debated (in Intensive Care Medicine). My view - especially for observational studies - is garbage in, garbage out! https://t.co/nQNva791xe
RT @trished: The other parts of the debate (Ioannidis and Guyatt) are linked to: ‘For contrasting viewpoints, please go to https://t.co/A2…
@gattinon told me at one of the @ESICM congresses when I presented our meta-analysis findings https://t.co/QN6EPp8NqR : you are an another one robbing the graves of researchers! Felt hurt, but rings true many times. There bone collectors and careful detect
RT @trished: The other parts of the debate (Ioannidis and Guyatt) are linked to: ‘For contrasting viewpoints, please go to https://t.co/A2…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @trished: The other parts of the debate (Ioannidis and Guyatt) are linked to: ‘For contrasting viewpoints, please go to https://t.co/A2…
RT @Info_Mastery: Three opinions on systematic reviews and meta-analyses. One thing is true - just because a forest plot can be done doesn’…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @dnunan79: Only just picked this up but looks like an interesting debate with some points I already have issues with. Will chew the fa…
RT @dnunan79: Only just picked this up but looks like an interesting debate with some points I already have issues with. Will chew the fa…
RT @Info_Mastery: Three opinions on systematic reviews and meta-analyses. One thing is true - just because a forest plot can be done doesn’…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @SimonChapman6: Three bookmarkable open access pieces on the ups & downs of systematic reviews https://t.co/bdeCkBJ8M5 + https://t.co/cO…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @trished: The other parts of the debate (Ioannidis and Guyatt) are linked to: ‘For contrasting viewpoints, please go to https://t.co/A2…