RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
3/3: Yes. https://t.co/z3MRZjRJfr
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @trished: The other parts of the debate (Ioannidis and Guyatt) are linked to: ‘For contrasting viewpoints, please go to https://t.co/A2…
RT @trished: The other parts of the debate (Ioannidis and Guyatt) are linked to: ‘For contrasting viewpoints, please go to https://t.co/A2…
RT @trished: The other parts of the debate (Ioannidis and Guyatt) are linked to: ‘For contrasting viewpoints, please go to https://t.co/A2…
RT @trished: The other parts of the debate (Ioannidis and Guyatt) are linked to: ‘For contrasting viewpoints, please go to https://t.co/A2…
RT @trished: The other parts of the debate (Ioannidis and Guyatt) are linked to: ‘For contrasting viewpoints, please go to https://t.co/A2…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
RT @SimonChapman6: Three bookmarkable open access pieces on the ups & downs of systematic reviews https://t.co/bdeCkBJ8M5 + https://t.co/cO…
Only just picked this up but looks like an interesting debate with some points I already have issues with. Will chew the fat on this with @krmahtani and @JKAronson https://t.co/h1mxGV02jQ
RT @SimonChapman6: Three bookmarkable open access pieces on the ups & downs of systematic reviews https://t.co/bdeCkBJ8M5 + https://t.co/cO…
Three opinions on systematic reviews and meta-analyses. One thing is true - just because a forest plot can be done doesn’t mean it should be. https://t.co/HsZZEXbGxV
RT @trished: The other parts of the debate (Ioannidis and Guyatt) are linked to: ‘For contrasting viewpoints, please go to https://t.co/A2…
RT @SimonChapman6: Three bookmarkable open access pieces on the ups & downs of systematic reviews https://t.co/bdeCkBJ8M5 + https://t.co/cO…
Three bookmarkable open access pieces on the ups & downs of systematic reviews https://t.co/bdeCkBJ8M5 + https://t.co/cOSmmMuKI8 + https://t.co/XxxoypaYvW
RT @trished: The other parts of the debate (Ioannidis and Guyatt) are linked to: ‘For contrasting viewpoints, please go to https://t.co/A2…
The other parts of the debate (Ioannidis and Guyatt) are linked to: ‘For contrasting viewpoints, please go to https://t.co/A2jzwxmxtj and https://t.co/YRWnrz6giO. ‘ https://t.co/8CFQbwMJA9
RT @yourICM: Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGui…
Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes/No/Not Sure https://t.co/rJrMlGoGmG https://t.co/KbfsURGuiZ https://t.co/P2ETe9TYa7 https://t.co/Cd2FzvHGPn
RT @drtintin99: Are systematic reviews and meta-analysis useful? What's your view? https://t.co/cf8vgyJSvX
Are systematic reviews and meta-analysis useful? What's your view? https://t.co/cf8vgyJSvX
RT @drtintin99: Are systematic reviews and meta-analysis useful? What's your view? https://t.co/cf8vgyshEp
Are systematic reviews and meta-analysis useful? What's your view? https://t.co/cf8vgyshEp
Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes https://t.co/yAeLqBUYyJ #IntCareMed