Title |
Preliminary investigation of the formation age and chemical characterization of the tropical peat in the middle Sepik Plain, northern Papua New Guinea
|
---|---|
Published in |
Geoscience Letters, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40562-015-0021-4 |
Authors |
Eisuke Ono, Mitsutoshi Umemura, Takuya Ishida, Chisato Takenaka |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 26% |
Researcher | 4 | 21% |
Lecturer | 3 | 16% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 3 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 4 | 21% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 11% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 11% |
Chemistry | 2 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 16% |
Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2015.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Geoscience Letters
#206
of 214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,603
of 270,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geoscience Letters
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 214 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.