↓ Skip to main content

Knowing the enemy: ant behavior and control in a pediatric hospital of Buenos Aires

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Knowing the enemy: ant behavior and control in a pediatric hospital of Buenos Aires
Published in
SpringerPlus, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-3-229
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roxana Josens, Francisco J Sola, Nahuel Marchisio, María Agostina Di Renzo, Alina Giacometti

Abstract

Ant control is difficult in systems even where a variety of control strategies and compounds are allowed; in sensitive places such as hospitals, where there are often restrictions on the methods and toxicants to be applied, the challenge is even greater. Here we report the methods and results of how we faced this challenge of controlling ants in a pediatric hospital using baits. Our strategy was based on identifying the species present and analyzing their behavior. On the one hand, we evaluated outdoors in the green areas of the hospital, the relative abundance of ant genera, their food preferences and the behavioral dominances. On the other hand, control treatments were performed using separately two boron compounds added to sucrose solution which was not highly concentrated to avoid constrains due to the viscosity. Most of the species in the food preference test accepted sugary food; only one species was recorded to visit it less than the protein foods. This result was consistent with the efficacy of control treatments by sugary baits within the rooms. For species that showed good acceptance of sugar solutions in the preference test outdoors, sugar bait control indoors was 100& effective. Conversely, for the only species that foraged significantly less on sugar food, the bait treatment was ineffective. This work reveals the importance of considering the behavior and feeding preferences of the species to be controlled by toxic baits.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 20%
Student > Bachelor 7 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Unspecified 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 37%
Environmental Science 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Unspecified 2 6%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 6 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2014.
All research outputs
#13,195,932
of 22,793,427 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#652
of 1,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,539
of 227,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#21
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,793,427 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.