The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Title |
Improving social accountability processes in the health sector in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, April 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12889-018-5407-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Georges Danhoundo, Khalidha Nasiri, Mary E. Wiktorowicz |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 198 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 25 | 13% |
Researcher | 18 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
Other | 48 | 24% |
Unknown | 59 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 16% |
Social Sciences | 24 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 12% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 12 | 6% |
Engineering | 6 | 3% |
Other | 34 | 17% |
Unknown | 68 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#5,469,859
of 25,455,127 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,510
of 17,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,732
of 342,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#176
of 315 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,455,127 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,602 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 315 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.