Title |
Homology of the root adhesin of Pseudomonas fluorescens OE 28.3 with porin F of P. neruginosa and P. syringae
|
---|---|
Published in |
Molecular Genetics and Genomics, February 1992
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf00292721 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
R. De Mot, P. Proost, J. Van Damme, J. Vanderleyden |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 36% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 14% |
Researcher | 2 | 14% |
Professor | 2 | 14% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 36% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 36% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
Engineering | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2012.
All research outputs
#3,798,945
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Genetics and Genomics
#113
of 3,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,566
of 61,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Genetics and Genomics
#4
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,319 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.