↓ Skip to main content

The fossil record of Glypturus (Decapoda: Axiidea: Callianassidae) revisited with additional observations and description of a new species

Overview of attention for article published in Swiss Journal of Palaeontology, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
The fossil record of Glypturus (Decapoda: Axiidea: Callianassidae) revisited with additional observations and description of a new species
Published in
Swiss Journal of Palaeontology, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s13358-013-0060-4
Authors

Matúš Hyžný, Ali Bahrami, Adiël A. Klompmaker, Mehdi Yazdi, Roger W. Portell, Christian Neumann

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Slovenia 1 17%
Unknown 5 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 33%
Librarian 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 33%
Arts and Humanities 1 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 17%
Materials Science 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2013.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Swiss Journal of Palaeontology
#67
of 143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,887
of 202,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Swiss Journal of Palaeontology
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.