| Title |
The fossil record of Glypturus (Decapoda: Axiidea: Callianassidae) revisited with additional observations and description of a new species
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Swiss Journal of Palaeontology, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13358-013-0060-4 |
| Authors |
Matúš Hyžný, Ali Bahrami, Adiël A. Klompmaker, Mehdi Yazdi, Roger W. Portell, Christian Neumann |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Slovenia | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 2 | 33% |
| Librarian | 1 | 17% |
| Researcher | 1 | 17% |
| Other | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 33% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 17% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2013.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Swiss Journal of Palaeontology
#67
of 143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,887
of 202,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Swiss Journal of Palaeontology
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.