| Title |
Quasistatic Crack Growth in Nonlinear Elasticity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, February 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00205-004-0351-4 |
| Authors |
Gianni Dal Maso, Gilles A. Francfort, Rodica Toader |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Czechia | 2 | 4% |
| Italy | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 39 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 33% |
| Researcher | 11 | 24% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 6 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 16 | 35% |
| Engineering | 14 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2013.
All research outputs
#7,850,857
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis
#27
of 787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,318
of 60,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 787 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them