| Title |
In Vitro Bactericidal and Virucidal Efficacy of Povidone-Iodine Gargle/Mouthwash Against Respiratory and Oral Tract Pathogens
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Infectious Diseases and Therapy, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40121-018-0200-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maren Eggers, Torsten Koburger-Janssen, Markus Eickmann, Juergen Zorn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 166 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 27 | 16% |
| India | 13 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 5% |
| Canada | 6 | 4% |
| South Africa | 3 | 2% |
| Japan | 3 | 2% |
| Colombia | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Thailand | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 88 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 133 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 11% |
| Scientists | 10 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 343 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 343 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 43 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 13% |
| Researcher | 29 | 8% |
| Other | 24 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 71 | 21% |
| Unknown | 114 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 121 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 3% |
| Engineering | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 41 | 12% |
| Unknown | 132 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 197. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2024.
All research outputs
#206,749
of 25,923,151 outputs
Outputs from Infectious Diseases and Therapy
#10
of 883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,663
of 345,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infectious Diseases and Therapy
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,923,151 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 883 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them