Title |
Mollusc grazing limits growth and early development of the old forest lichen Lobaria pulmonaria in broadleaved deciduous forests
|
---|---|
Published in |
Oecologia, November 2007
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00442-007-0891-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Johan Asplund, Yngvar Gauslaa |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | 3% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
Norway | 1 | 2% |
Finland | 1 | 2% |
Argentina | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 54 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 22% |
Student > Master | 11 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 8% |
Other | 8 | 13% |
Unknown | 10 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 53% |
Environmental Science | 13 | 22% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 12 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2020.
All research outputs
#5,611,796
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,118
of 4,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,224
of 94,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#7
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.