The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
The systematic value of nuclear genome size for “all” species of Tulipa L. (Liliaceae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Systematics and Evolution, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00606-009-0203-7 |
| Authors |
Ben J. M. Zonneveld |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 20% |
| Unknown | 10 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 44% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 10 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2022.
All research outputs
#8,980,133
of 26,388,722 outputs
Outputs from Plant Systematics and Evolution
#166
of 994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,438
of 125,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Systematics and Evolution
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,388,722 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 994 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.