↓ Skip to main content

The genera Lithothamnium, Leptophytum (nov. gen.) and Phymatolithon in the Gulf of Maine

Overview of attention for article published in Hydrobiologia, December 1966
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
The genera Lithothamnium, Leptophytum (nov. gen.) and Phymatolithon in the Gulf of Maine
Published in
Hydrobiologia, December 1966
DOI 10.1007/bf00130389
Authors

Walter H. Adey

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Student > Master 2 18%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 73%
Environmental Science 1 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2021.
All research outputs
#8,783,469
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Hydrobiologia
#1
of 5 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,132
of 11,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrobiologia
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.8. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them