↓ Skip to main content

Linear and nonlinear computations of the 1992 Nicaragua earthquake tsunami

Overview of attention for article published in Pure and Applied Geophysics, September 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
216 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Linear and nonlinear computations of the 1992 Nicaragua earthquake tsunami
Published in
Pure and Applied Geophysics, September 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf00874378
Authors

Kenji Satake

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Mexico 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 71 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 21%
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 12%
Professor 5 7%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 31 41%
Engineering 15 20%
Mathematics 5 7%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Physics and Astronomy 3 4%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 15 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2015.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Pure and Applied Geophysics
#202
of 880 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,002
of 22,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pure and Applied Geophysics
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 880 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.