↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Phycology, January 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Published in
Journal of Applied Phycology, January 1999
DOI 10.1023/a:1008178208949
Authors

Brian Duval, Kalidas Shetty, William H. Thomas

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 102 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 22%
Researcher 24 22%
Student > Master 20 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 24 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 10%
Unspecified 9 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 7%
Environmental Science 7 6%
Other 17 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2012.
All research outputs
#3,546,166
of 12,339,052 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Phycology
#188
of 1,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,690
of 271,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Phycology
#2
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,339,052 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,668 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.