↓ Skip to main content

Characterisation of Tetraploid and Diploid Clones of Spodoptera frugiperda Cell Line

Overview of attention for article published in Cytotechnology, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Characterisation of Tetraploid and Diploid Clones of Spodoptera frugiperda Cell Line
Published in
Cytotechnology, January 2004
DOI 10.1023/b:cyto.0000043394.40309.48
Authors

R.F. Jarman-Smith, C. Mannix, M. Al-Rubeai

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 6%
Egypt 1 6%
Unknown 14 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Researcher 4 25%
Student > Master 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 69%
Unspecified 2 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Chemical Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2012.
All research outputs
#3,547,441
of 12,342,655 outputs
Outputs from Cytotechnology
#154
of 588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,750
of 271,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cytotechnology
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,342,655 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 588 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them