↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmaceutical Research, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Published in
Pharmaceutical Research, January 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1007657109012
Authors

Daniel W. Drolet, Joyce Nelson, Christopher E. Tucker, Philip M. Zack, Kerry Nixon, Richard Bolin, Mark B. Judkins, James A. Farmer, Julie L. Wolf, Stanley C. Gill, Raymond A. Bendele

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
China 1 2%
Unknown 40 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 26%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 9 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 51%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Unspecified 3 7%
Chemistry 3 7%
Other 4 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2012.
All research outputs
#3,542,900
of 12,330,736 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#579
of 1,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,641
of 271,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,330,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,966 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.