↓ Skip to main content

Recognition of Adenosine Triphosphate Binding Sites Using Parallel Cascade System Identification

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Recognition of Adenosine Triphosphate Binding Sites Using Parallel Cascade System Identification
Published in
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
DOI 10.1114/1.1561293
Authors

James R. Green, Michael J. Korenberg, Robert David, Ian W. Hunter

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 20%
Canada 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 60%
Lecturer 1 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 40%
Engineering 2 40%
Computer Science 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2017.
All research outputs
#1,646,127
of 9,633,164 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Biomedical Engineering
#87
of 723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,566
of 103,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Biomedical Engineering
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,633,164 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.