| Title |
Beyond objective testing and peer assessment: alternative ways of assessment in MOOCs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.7238/rusc.v12i1.2262 |
| Authors |
María del Mar Sánchez-Vera, María Paz Prendes-Espinosa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 7 | 78% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Turkey | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 38 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 14 | 19% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 7% |
| Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 40 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2016.
All research outputs
#4,523,607
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#288
of 522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,612
of 377,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.