| Title |
Security Protection of DICOM Medical Images Using Dual-Layer Reversible Watermarking with Tamper Detection Capability
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10278-010-9295-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chun Kiat Tan, Jason Changwei Ng, Xiaotian Xu, Chueh Loo Poh, Yong Liang Guan, Kenneth Sheah |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 16 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 34 | 45% |
| Engineering | 6 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2021.
All research outputs
#5,596,984
of 25,899,121 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
#31
of 221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,003
of 106,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,899,121 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 221 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them