Title |
Bioconjugated silica nanoparticles: Development and applications
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nano Research, July 2008
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12274-008-8018-3 |
Authors |
Lin Wang, Wenjun Zhao, Weihong Tan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 334 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
China | 2 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Lithuania | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Romania | 1 | <1% |
Other | 3 | <1% |
Unknown | 319 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 76 | 23% |
Student > Master | 60 | 18% |
Researcher | 52 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 28 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 4% |
Other | 49 | 15% |
Unknown | 56 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 102 | 31% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 12% |
Engineering | 25 | 7% |
Materials Science | 24 | 7% |
Physics and Astronomy | 14 | 4% |
Other | 64 | 19% |
Unknown | 65 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,932,935
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nano Research
#130
of 4,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,637
of 101,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nano Research
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,144 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.