| Title |
Complete mitochondrial genome of Chinese Noctule bat, Nyctalus plancyi (Microchiroptera: Vespertilionidae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics Resources, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12686-018-1002-7 |
| Authors |
Lichun Jiang, Rendan Meng, Hao Liu, Zhangqiang You, Ling Zhao, Xiaodong Jia, Hongyan Shi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2018.
All research outputs
#17,937,475
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics Resources
#246
of 344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#307,936
of 437,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics Resources
#15
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 344 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.