@InCytometry You insist your methodology is perfect, in the face of real world evidence that says otherwise. I notice you've made no argument beyond "trust my expertise". Well, many other experts say contamination is a longstanding problem, why credit you
@db19794 @EduEngineer @Debunk_the_Funk @Kevin_McKernan I found a couple interesting article about both PCR and blood cultures the might shed some light on the problems involved was interpreting some of this. https://t.co/kwjIkZkpap https://t.co/bERsxOEZqn
@karl_haynes It’s something testing centres & laboratories try to prevent, obviously, but it’s easier said than done https://t.co/kXvIXkQSiU
@ClareCraigPath https://t.co/5sVHLwHj63 ‘Only a very limited number....of studies have been published so far, but these showed false-positive rates of 9-57%.’ Contamination was well known in 2004; how are those highly pressured pop-up labs doing under Dido
RT @DrJackKruse: There are few out there. Here is one. https://t.co/DgZQnOWUKp Look up the founder of the test. He hates how it is bein…
RT @DrJackKruse: There are few out there. Here is one. https://t.co/DgZQnOWUKp Look up the founder of the test. He hates how it is bein…
There are few out there. Here is one. https://t.co/DgZQnOWUKp Look up the founder of the test. He hates how it is being abused now.
@7711irwin @EversoNancy @smokewagon_szn @ifindkarma @NoahShachtman @MollyJongFast @attackerman @WillBredderman Nucleic acid test have been under controversial discussion for a long time. Only the woefully ignorant can't see that the Dems & their MSM p