↓ Skip to main content

Nonexistence of stable F-stationary maps of a functional related to pullback metrics

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Inequalities & Applications, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Nonexistence of stable F-stationary maps of a functional related to pullback metrics
Published in
Journal of Inequalities & Applications, September 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13660-017-1483-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Li, Fang Liu, Peibiao Zhao

Abstract

Let [Formula: see text] be a compact convex hypersurface in [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we prove that if the principal curvatures [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] satisfy [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], then there exists no nonconstant stable F-stationary map between M and a compact Riemannian manifold when (6) or (7) holds.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 1 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2018.
All research outputs
#11,280,150
of 12,680,099 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inequalities & Applications
#55
of 126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,083
of 273,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inequalities & Applications
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,680,099 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them