↓ Skip to main content

Evidence of two genetically deeply divergent species of warthog, Phacochoerus africanus and P. aethiopicus (Artiodactyla: Suiformes) in East Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Mammalian Biology, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Evidence of two genetically deeply divergent species of warthog, Phacochoerus africanus and P. aethiopicus (Artiodactyla: Suiformes) in East Africa
Published in
Mammalian Biology, January 2002
DOI 10.1078/1616-5047-00013
Authors

E. Randi, J.-P. D′Huart, V. Lucchini, R. Aman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 5%
Italy 1 2%
Chile 1 2%
United Arab Emirates 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 52 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 23%
Student > Master 10 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Professor 5 8%
Other 5 8%
Other 16 26%
Unknown 2 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 61%
Environmental Science 10 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 2 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,711,550
of 13,583,919 outputs
Outputs from Mammalian Biology
#109
of 390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,411
of 281,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mammalian Biology
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,583,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.