↓ Skip to main content

Clinical relevance of palmaris longus agenesis: Common anatomical aberration

Overview of attention for article published in Anatomical Science International, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 104)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Clinical relevance of palmaris longus agenesis: Common anatomical aberration
Published in
Anatomical Science International, March 2008
DOI 10.1111/j.1447-073x.2007.00199.x
Authors

Sudhir K. Kapoor, Akshay Tiwari, Abhishek Kumar, Rajesh Bhatia, Vinay Tantuway, Saurabh Kapoor

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 35%
Unspecified 6 18%
Student > Postgraduate 4 12%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Other 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 14 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 32%
Unspecified 6 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2011.
All research outputs
#3,550,410
of 12,355,000 outputs
Outputs from Anatomical Science International
#17
of 104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,748
of 269,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anatomical Science International
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,355,000 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them