↓ Skip to main content

Visual support system for remote control by adaptive ROI selection of monitoring robot

Overview of attention for article published in ROBOMECH Journal, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Visual support system for remote control by adaptive ROI selection of monitoring robot
Published in
ROBOMECH Journal, March 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40648-018-0103-0
Authors

Shota Samejima, Khusniddin Fozilov, Kosuke Sekiyama

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Other 2 25%
Researcher 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 2 25%
Psychology 1 13%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Engineering 1 13%
Design 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2018.
All research outputs
#14,378,457
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from ROBOMECH Journal
#30
of 70 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,821
of 333,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ROBOMECH Journal
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 70 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.