| Title |
Exploring tarnished daguerreotypes with synchrotron light: XRF and μ-XANES analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Heritage Science, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40494-018-0171-8 |
| Authors |
M. S. Kozachuk, T. K. Sham, R. R. Martin, A. J. Nelson, I. Coulthard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 26% |
| Researcher | 4 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 1 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 4 | 21% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 16% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 21% |
| Unknown | 3 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2018.
All research outputs
#18,591,506
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Heritage Science
#356
of 419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,069
of 331,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heritage Science
#15
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.