↓ Skip to main content

Percolation of a collection of finite random walks: a model for gas permeation through thin polymeric membranes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 157)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Percolation of a collection of finite random walks: a model for gas permeation through thin polymeric membranes
Published in
Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, May 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10910-008-9367-6
Authors

R. K. P. Zia, Yong Wu, B. Schmittmann

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 40%
Professor 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 2 40%
Mathematics 1 20%
Energy 1 20%
Chemistry 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2008.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mathematical Chemistry
#17
of 157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,667
of 78,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mathematical Chemistry
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them