↓ Skip to main content

Steep switching devices for low power applications: negative differential capacitance/resistance field effect transistors

Overview of attention for article published in Nano Convergence, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 123)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Steep switching devices for low power applications: negative differential capacitance/resistance field effect transistors
Published in
Nano Convergence, January 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40580-018-0135-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eunah Ko, Jaemin Shin, Changhwan Shin

Abstract

Simply including either single ferroelectric oxide layer or threshold selector, we can make conventional field effect transistor to have super steep switching characteristic, i.e., sub-60-mV/decade of subthreshold slope. One of the representative is negative capacitance FET (NCFET), in which a ferroelectric layer is added within its gate stack. The other is phase FET (i.e., negative resistance FET), in which a threshold selector is added to an electrode (e.g., source or drain) of conventional field effect transistor. Although the concept of the aforementioned two devices was presented more or less recently, numerous studies have been published. In this review paper, by reviewing the published studies over the last decade, we shall de-brief and discuss the history and the future perspectives of NCFET/phase FET, respectively. The background, experimental investigation, and future direction for developing the aforementioned two representative steep switching devices (i.e., NCFET and phase FET/negative resistance FET) are to be discussed in detail.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 23%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 25 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 25 36%
Physics and Astronomy 4 6%
Materials Science 4 6%
Unspecified 2 3%
Energy 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 30 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2018.
All research outputs
#2,200,895
of 24,990,015 outputs
Outputs from Nano Convergence
#6
of 123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,350
of 452,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nano Convergence
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,990,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them