↓ Skip to main content

Why the Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever Cannot Be Solved in Less than Three Questions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Philosophical Logic, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Why the Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever Cannot Be Solved in Less than Three Questions
Published in
Journal of Philosophical Logic, May 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10992-011-9181-7
Authors

Gregory Wheeler, Pedro Barahona

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 50%
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 2 50%
Linguistics 1 25%
Engineering 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2014.
All research outputs
#870,407
of 3,803,398 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Philosophical Logic
#9
of 63 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,837
of 114,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Philosophical Logic
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,803,398 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 63rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 63 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them