↓ Skip to main content

Exploring d-xylose oxidation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through the Weimberg pathway

Overview of attention for article published in AMB Express, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Exploring d-xylose oxidation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through the Weimberg pathway
Published in
AMB Express, March 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13568-018-0564-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa Wasserstrom, Diogo Portugal-Nunes, Henrik Almqvist, Anders G. Sandström, Gunnar Lidén, Marie F. Gorwa-Grauslund

Abstract

Engineering of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae towards efficient D-xylose assimilation has been a major focus over the last decades since D-xylose is the second most abundant sugar in nature, and its conversion into products could significantly improve process economy in biomass-based processes. Up to now, two different metabolic routes have been introduced via genetic engineering, consisting of either the isomerization or the oxido-reduction of D-xylose to D-xylulose that is further connected to the pentose phosphate pathway and glycolysis. In the present study, cytosolic D-xylose oxidation was investigated instead, through the introduction of the Weimberg pathway from Caulobacter crescentus in S. cerevisiae. This pathway consists of five reaction steps that connect D-xylose to the TCA cycle intermediate α-ketoglutarate. The corresponding genes could be expressed in S. cerevisiae, but no growth was observed on D-xylose indicating that not all the enzymes were functionally active. The accumulation of the Weimberg intermediate D-xylonate suggested that the dehydration step(s) might be limiting, blocking further conversion into α-ketoglutarate. Although four alternative dehydratases both of bacterial and archaeon origins were evaluated, D-xylonate accumulation still occurred. A better understanding of the mechanisms associated with the activity of dehydratases, both at a bacterial and yeast level, appears essential to obtain a fully functional Weimberg pathway in S. cerevisiae.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 21%
Student > Bachelor 10 16%
Student > Master 10 16%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 16 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 16%
Engineering 6 10%
Chemical Engineering 3 5%
Chemistry 3 5%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 17 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2018.
All research outputs
#17,932,482
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from AMB Express
#739
of 1,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,402
of 332,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AMB Express
#35
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,241 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.