↓ Skip to main content

Colonic atresia and anorectal malformation in a Haitian patient: a case study of rare diseases

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Colonic atresia and anorectal malformation in a Haitian patient: a case study of rare diseases
Published in
SpringerPlus, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-3-203
Pubmed ID
Authors

Max Herby Derenoncourt, Gerard Baltazar, Tamar Lubell, Alice Ruscica, Cyril Sahyoun, Francisca Velcek

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Other 6 27%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 14%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2014.
All research outputs
#15,493,741
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#941
of 1,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,660
of 227,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#43
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,855 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.