↓ Skip to main content

DNW innovations in wind tunnel testing: new moving belt system for Large Low speed Facility

Overview of attention for article published in CEAS Aeronautical Journal, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
DNW innovations in wind tunnel testing: new moving belt system for Large Low speed Facility
Published in
CEAS Aeronautical Journal, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13272-018-0285-4
Authors

Christophe Hermans, Sinus Hegen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 50%
Engineering 1 25%
Design 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,906,399
of 12,600,122 outputs
Outputs from CEAS Aeronautical Journal
#9
of 13 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,275
of 272,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CEAS Aeronautical Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,600,122 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them