RT @XabiVC: @jcamthrash Pretty much what others claimed last year in a diff paper: https://t.co/4S1MSE4aBy
RT @nathcharbonnel: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/sX0cvzz8Zv
RT @nathcharbonnel: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/sX0cvzz8Zv
Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/sX0cvzz8Zv
Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in #microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem. https://t.co/ypjm0nZkIU https://t.co/KVs1kXKRJP
RT @metagenomic_lit: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem. https://t.co/J3lwvcKr0L
RT @metagenomic_lit: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem. https://t.co/J3lwvcKr0L
RT @metagenomic_lit: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem. https://t.co/J3lwvcKr0L
RT @metagenomic_lit: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem. https://t.co/J3lwvcKr0L
RT @metagenomic_lit: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem. https://t.co/J3lwvcKr0L
Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem. https://t.co/IN4gNOejuh
RT @metagenomic_lit: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem. https://t.co/J3lwvcKr0L
Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem. https://t.co/J3lwvcKr0L
Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem. https://t.co/2yxhN14Jzh
Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/jpx5fCJNAC
RT @HollyKArnold: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem: https://t.co/87zWxpkyIW
Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem: https://t.co/87zWxpkyIW
RT @MicrobiomeJ: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/EZyqbZocTK
RT @MicrobiomeJ: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/EZyqbZocTK
RT @MicrobiomeJ: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/EZyqbZocTK
RT @MicrobiomeJ: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/EZyqbZocTK
RT @SahaSurya: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in #microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/aLbPauwOol
Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in #microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/aLbPauwOol
Should we be correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys? https://t.co/0YkWCf6VOU
RT @stevenhggns: Now this is the kind of no nonsense paper I can agree with https://t.co/GJW3jWwi1h
RT @stevenhggns: Now this is the kind of no nonsense paper I can agree with https://t.co/GJW3jWwi1h
RT @stevenhggns: Now this is the kind of no nonsense paper I can agree with https://t.co/GJW3jWwi1h
Now this is the kind of no nonsense paper I can agree with https://t.co/GJW3jWwi1h
RT @jcamthrash: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/KjIxdTFHCN
RT @Tyu_Shi: データコピーがなかなか終わらないので、待ち時間に気になっていた "Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem"…
RT @jcamthrash: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/KjIxdTFHCN
RT @fonamental: the correction of the 16S rRNA copy number effect might be an unsolved issue but at least you can try something... in eukar…
RT @fonamental: the correction of the 16S rRNA copy number effect might be an unsolved issue but at least you can try something... in eukar…
RT @lab_gomez: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/43Cbnmx2Al
RT @micro_papers: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/VZjCyiMG0w
RT @micro_papers: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/VZjCyiMG0w
Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/43Cbnmx2Al
RT @fonamental: the correction of the 16S rRNA copy number effect might be an unsolved issue but at least you can try something... in eukar…
RT @jcamthrash: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/KjIxdTFHCN
RT @jcamthrash: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/KjIxdTFHCN
RT @jcamthrash: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/KjIxdTFHCN
RT @talitha_santini: In short - don’t bother correcting for 16S gene copy number in amplicon data unless most of your sequences are very cl…
RT @talitha_santini: In short - don’t bother correcting for 16S gene copy number in amplicon data unless most of your sequences are very cl…
RT @Tyu_Shi: データコピーがなかなか終わらないので、待ち時間に気になっていた "Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem"…
RT @jcamthrash: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/KjIxdTFHCN
RT @talitha_santini: In short - don’t bother correcting for 16S gene copy number in amplicon data unless most of your sequences are very cl…
RT @talitha_santini: In short - don’t bother correcting for 16S gene copy number in amplicon data unless most of your sequences are very cl…
RT @talitha_santini: In short - don’t bother correcting for 16S gene copy number in amplicon data unless most of your sequences are very cl…
RT @talitha_santini: In short - don’t bother correcting for 16S gene copy number in amplicon data unless most of your sequences are very cl…
RT @fonamental: the correction of the 16S rRNA copy number effect might be an unsolved issue but at least you can try something... in eukar…
RT @fonamental: the correction of the 16S rRNA copy number effect might be an unsolved issue but at least you can try something... in eukar…
RT @MicrobiomeJ: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/EZyqbZocTK
RT @Tyu_Shi: データコピーがなかなか終わらないので、待ち時間に気になっていた "Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem"…
RT @Tyu_Shi: データコピーがなかなか終わらないので、待ち時間に気になっていた "Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem"…
RT @talitha_santini: In short - don’t bother correcting for 16S gene copy number in amplicon data unless most of your sequences are very cl…
データコピーがなかなか終わらないので、待ち時間に気になっていた "Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem" https://t.co/XZnxOVqXpL を読もう。
RT @yokadzaki: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/dkHPeJnApc
RT @jcamthrash: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/KjIxdTFHCN
RT @jcamthrash: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/KjIxdTFHCN
RT @jcamthrash: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/KjIxdTFHCN
RT @talitha_santini: In short - don’t bother correcting for 16S gene copy number in amplicon data unless most of your sequences are very cl…
RT @talitha_santini: In short - don’t bother correcting for 16S gene copy number in amplicon data unless most of your sequences are very cl…
RT @jcamthrash: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/KjIxdTFHCN
RT @talitha_santini: In short - don’t bother correcting for 16S gene copy number in amplicon data unless most of your sequences are very cl…
RT @talitha_santini: In short - don’t bother correcting for 16S gene copy number in amplicon data unless most of your sequences are very cl…
RT @talitha_santini: In short - don’t bother correcting for 16S gene copy number in amplicon data unless most of your sequences are very cl…
RT @talitha_santini: In short - don’t bother correcting for 16S gene copy number in amplicon data unless most of your sequences are very cl…
RT @jcamthrash: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/KjIxdTFHCN
RT @jcamthrash: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/KjIxdTFHCN
RT @talitha_santini: In short - don’t bother correcting for 16S gene copy number in amplicon data unless most of your sequences are very cl…
RT @talitha_santini: In short - don’t bother correcting for 16S gene copy number in amplicon data unless most of your sequences are very cl…
RT @yokadzaki: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/dkHPeJnApc
RT @talitha_santini: In short - don’t bother correcting for 16S gene copy number in amplicon data unless most of your sequences are very cl…
RT @julio_514: We find that regardless of the phylogenetic method tested, 16S GCNs could only be accurately predicted for a limited fracti…
RT @talitha_santini: In short - don’t bother correcting for 16S gene copy number in amplicon data unless most of your sequences are very cl…
RT @talitha_santini: In short - don’t bother correcting for 16S gene copy number in amplicon data unless most of your sequences are very cl…
RT @talitha_santini: In short - don’t bother correcting for 16S gene copy number in amplicon data unless most of your sequences are very cl…
RT @talitha_santini: In short - don’t bother correcting for 16S gene copy number in amplicon data unless most of your sequences are very cl…
RT @talitha_santini: In short - don’t bother correcting for 16S gene copy number in amplicon data unless most of your sequences are very cl…
RT @talitha_santini: In short - don’t bother correcting for 16S gene copy number in amplicon data unless most of your sequences are very cl…
RT @Psychobiotic: Predicting bacterial proportions from 16S rRNA is tricky, because different microbes may contain multiple copies of the g…
RT @talitha_santini: In short - don’t bother correcting for 16S gene copy number in amplicon data unless most of your sequences are very cl…
RT @MicrobiomeJ: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/EZyqbZocTK
RT @talitha_santini: In short - don’t bother correcting for 16S gene copy number in amplicon data unless most of your sequences are very cl…
Predicting bacterial proportions from 16S rRNA is tricky, because different microbes may contain multiple copies of the gene. This study details the state of the art as of today. https://t.co/s8xoPYojNC
RT @talitha_santini: In short - don’t bother correcting for 16S gene copy number in amplicon data unless most of your sequences are very cl…
Top story: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys rema… https://t.co/gigLWfg4Pz, see more https://t.co/jx5nhBvCiY
RT @jcamthrash: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/KjIxdTFHCN
RT @talitha_santini: In short - don’t bother correcting for 16S gene copy number in amplicon data unless most of your sequences are very cl…
RT @jcamthrash: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/KjIxdTFHCN
RT @talitha_santini: In short - don’t bother correcting for 16S gene copy number in amplicon data unless most of your sequences are very cl…
RT @yokadzaki: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/dkHPeJnApc
RT @talitha_santini: In short - don’t bother correcting for 16S gene copy number in amplicon data unless most of your sequences are very cl…
Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/dkHPeJnApc
RT @talitha_santini: In short - don’t bother correcting for 16S gene copy number in amplicon data unless most of your sequences are very cl…
RT @talitha_santini: In short - don’t bother correcting for 16S gene copy number in amplicon data unless most of your sequences are very cl…
RT @jcamthrash: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/KjIxdTFHCN
RT @jcamthrash: Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem https://t.co/KjIxdTFHCN