| Title |
Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbiome, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40168-018-0420-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stilianos Louca, Michael Doebeli, Laura Wegener Parfrey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 135 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 36 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 6% |
| France | 8 | 6% |
| Australia | 6 | 4% |
| Germany | 6 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| Japan | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Norway | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 43 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 81 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 52 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 564 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 564 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 146 | 26% |
| Researcher | 93 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 81 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 5% |
| Other | 66 | 12% |
| Unknown | 103 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 168 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 113 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 47 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 35 | 6% |
| Engineering | 19 | 3% |
| Other | 52 | 9% |
| Unknown | 130 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2021.
All research outputs
#527,495
of 25,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#133
of 1,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,901
of 346,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#6
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,807 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.