RT @4MelanieHawkins: Check the 5 sources of validity evidence framework https://t.co/yt3yXH36Dz and https://t.co/Egh7YIQgjw From the validi…
Check the 5 sources of validity evidence framework https://t.co/yt3yXH36Dz and https://t.co/Egh7YIQgjw From the validity testing standards at @AERA_EdResearch as applied to #PROMs at #isoqol2022
9/ Other excellent refs on modern validity theory and patient-centered outcomes https://t.co/cOmBkW20y4 https://t.co/yO3lXRNynu https://t.co/JzfzKq23N8 https://t.co/2B5NUBFRKd https://t.co/Ey1PZBsJyI
@bendean1979 Agree. New for PROMs in health (but old in eduction/psychology) is the mounting of careful argument that a PROM does what a researcher/clinician/decision-maker needs. PROM thinking urgently needs reform https://t.co/a4xJE8KeDY
@drddawoud @trishgreenhalgh @EuroQol 3/3 as an author of the Aust HRQoL (AQoL), and intervention developer/tester, and developed/tested ~10 PROMs, I see quite a disconnect bt PROM developers and their responsibility (science) around Consequences of using a
@trishgreenhalgh 3/3 If you are developing and testing a qnr. please DON'T say it was validated... its the data it generates, in particular contexts, for particular purposes that gets validated. https://t.co/mD1hb17Gjo and use our validity testing framewo
@DrTraceyK @ProfPCDoherty @KulikovUNIATF @MikkelsenBente_ @IUHPE @TheLancet @NIH They are the names of the HLQ scales: each as 4 to 6 items (see eg. below). It's one of most widely used contemporary #HealthLiteracy qnrs now, prob the most rigorously tested
RT @4MelanieHawkins: See also https://t.co/N3RxAqnVLr More validity testing papers in this series coming soon...
See also https://t.co/N3RxAqnVLr More validity testing papers in this series coming soon...
For those interested in measurement science... So pleased that this Validity Testing theory work by @4MelanieHawkins in her PhD with us is getting such global interest - on #heallthliteracy measurement. https://t.co/nJiH3Qp0Xr Please consider: Conseque
From our special section on "Test Construction", an application of validity theory & methodology to patient-reported outcome measures: https://t.co/KHrfDSBGdH It highlights the expertise involved to ensure integrity of interpretations & decisions.
RT @RichardOsborne4: @GregorWell This is the original paper: https://t.co/FeAt1gZehb And this is some thinking around validity https://t.…
@GregorWell This is the original paper: https://t.co/FeAt1gZehb And this is some thinking around validity https://t.co/mD1hb17Gjo
Access to the original paper: https://t.co/FeAt1gZehb & and thoughts about validity testing here: https://t.co/mD1hb17Gjo... remember, a qnr can never be said "to be validated" just the data it produces in specific contexts. Validation is an ongoing pr
Application of validity theory and methodology to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): building an argument for validity https://t.co/Xm4Ff63QC0
@PassiReetu Thats another qnr, not HLQ. I encourage anyone engaged in qnrs to read @4MelanieHawkins paper on what validation REALLY is https://t.co/mD1hb17Gjo -a qnr is never validated, its the data it generates that is validated, in particular contexts/pu
@MeasurementGal Also Pamela A Moss and Lorrie A Shepard - each have many publications about validity for test use. And me: https://t.co/Egh7YJ7jlw
RT @RichardOsborne4: If you have ever written "this questionnaire is valid..." then please read this https://t.co/mD1hb17Gjo Now @4MelanieH…
RT @RichardOsborne4: If you have ever written "this questionnaire is valid..." then please read this https://t.co/mD1hb17Gjo Now @4MelanieH…
RT @GlobalPHObserv: Application of validity theory and methodology to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) https://t.co/G5KR8ehYou
RT @GlobalPHObserv: Application of validity theory and methodology to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) https://t.co/G5KR8ehYou
RT @GlobalPHObserv: Application of validity theory and methodology to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) https://t.co/G5KR8ehYou
RT @RichardOsborne4: If you have ever written "this questionnaire is valid..." then please read this https://t.co/mD1hb17Gjo Now @4MelanieH…
RT @RichardOsborne4: If you have ever written "this questionnaire is valid..." then please read this https://t.co/mD1hb17Gjo Now @4MelanieH…
Application of validity theory and methodology to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) https://t.co/G5KR8ehYou
RT @RichardOsborne4: If you have ever written "this questionnaire is valid..." then please read this https://t.co/mD1hb17Gjo Now @4MelanieH…
RT @RichardOsborne4: If you have ever written "this questionnaire is valid..." then please read this https://t.co/mD1hb17Gjo Now @4MelanieH…
❤️❤️❤️
RT @RichardOsborne4: If you have ever written "this questionnaire is valid..." then please read this https://t.co/mD1hb17Gjo Now @4MelanieH…
RT @RichardOsborne4: If you have ever written "this questionnaire is valid..." then please read this https://t.co/mD1hb17Gjo Now @4MelanieH…
saving to read later
RT @RichardOsborne4: If you have ever written "this questionnaire is valid..." then please read this https://t.co/mD1hb17Gjo Now @4MelanieH…
RT @RichardOsborne4: If you have ever written "this questionnaire is valid..." then please read this https://t.co/mD1hb17Gjo Now @4MelanieH…
RT @RichardOsborne4: If you have ever written "this questionnaire is valid..." then please read this https://t.co/mD1hb17Gjo Now @4MelanieH…
RT @RichardOsborne4: If you have ever written "this questionnaire is valid..." then please read this https://t.co/mD1hb17Gjo Now @4MelanieH…
If you have ever written "this questionnaire is valid..." then please read this https://t.co/mD1hb17Gjo Now @4MelanieHawkins is on a mission to eliminate "this qnr is robust" which I'm guilty of writing recently. Its all to advance scientific integrity.
RT @RichardOsborne4: The #HealthLiteracy Questionnaire #HLQ is now used in 48 countries. Most widely in Europe. We still need to keep doing…
RT @RichardOsborne4: The #HealthLiteracy Questionnaire #HLQ is now used in 48 countries. Most widely in Europe. We still need to keep doing…
RT @RichardOsborne4: The #HealthLiteracy Questionnaire #HLQ is now used in 48 countries. Most widely in Europe. We still need to keep doing…
RT @RichardOsborne4: The #HealthLiteracy Questionnaire #HLQ is now used in 48 countries. Most widely in Europe. We still need to keep doing…
RT @RichardOsborne4: The #HealthLiteracy Questionnaire #HLQ is now used in 48 countries. Most widely in Europe. We still need to keep doing…
RT @RichardOsborne4: The #HealthLiteracy Questionnaire #HLQ is now used in 48 countries. Most widely in Europe. We still need to keep doing…
The #HealthLiteracy Questionnaire #HLQ is now used in 48 countries. Most widely in Europe. We still need to keep doing robust validity testing per the approach of @melgofar et al https://t.co/mD1hb1phHY https://t.co/kDNx5UgKrV
And it has such a rich range of evidence around its validity in many settings. We actually use it to test new theory and practice around PROMs/PREMs (questionnaire) validity testing https://t.co/WDA5eGKYCs
1/5 Hawkins & colleagues argue that "validity testing theory and methodology are rarely evident in the PROM validation literature." https://t.co/KHrfDSBGdH #openaccess #qol This will also be a topic of a pre-conference workshop at #ISOQOL18: https://t
RT @Ophelia_news: @RichardOsborne4 Are we going about #PROM development/testing/thinking the wrong way? The team who developed the very wid…
RT @Ophelia_news: @RichardOsborne4 Are we going about #PROM development/testing/thinking the wrong way? The team who developed the very wid…
RT @Ophelia_news: @RichardOsborne4 Are we going about #PROM development/testing/thinking the wrong way? The team who developed the very wid…
@RichardOsborne4 Are we going about #PROM development/testing/thinking the wrong way? The team who developed the very widely used #HealthLiteracy Questionnaire, the #HLQ, will get you to look at this at @ISOQOL https://t.co/CTqaGXmPJf this is the backgr p
RT @RichardOsborne4: I'm so sick of reading weak questionnaire/PROM "validation papers" For 30+ years its been know that a qnr/PROM is *NOT…
For the #PROM/#PREM nerds... a whole edition on Questionnaire/Test construction in #QLR https://t.co/n8k4NLk7Qb Great that our paper by @melgofar has had massive downloads https://t.co/TV9qSBFgBT
@Bokofil @trishgreenhalgh @melgofar in my team is leading the thinking here... the health sector has ignored mostly, past 40 years of thinking from the Education and Psych tesing fields. A key issue Melanie worries about Consequences of Testing. here paper
RT @RichardOsborne4: I'm so sick of reading weak questionnaire/PROM "validation papers" For 30+ years its been know that a qnr/PROM is *NOT…
RT @RichardOsborne4: I'm so sick of reading weak questionnaire/PROM "validation papers" For 30+ years its been know that a qnr/PROM is *NOT…
RT @RichardOsborne4: I'm so sick of reading weak questionnaire/PROM "validation papers" For 30+ years its been know that a qnr/PROM is *NOT…
RT @RichardOsborne4: I'm so sick of reading weak questionnaire/PROM "validation papers" For 30+ years its been know that a qnr/PROM is *NOT…
RT @RichardOsborne4: I'm so sick of reading weak questionnaire/PROM "validation papers" For 30+ years its been know that a qnr/PROM is *NOT…
RT @RichardOsborne4: I'm so sick of reading weak questionnaire/PROM "validation papers" For 30+ years its been know that a qnr/PROM is *NOT…
RT @RichardOsborne4: I'm so sick of reading weak questionnaire/PROM "validation papers" For 30+ years its been know that a qnr/PROM is *NOT…
RT @RichardOsborne4: I'm so sick of reading weak questionnaire/PROM "validation papers" For 30+ years its been know that a qnr/PROM is *NOT…
RT @RichardOsborne4: I'm so sick of reading weak questionnaire/PROM "validation papers" For 30+ years its been know that a qnr/PROM is *NOT…
RT @RichardOsborne4: I'm so sick of reading weak questionnaire/PROM "validation papers" For 30+ years its been know that a qnr/PROM is *NOT…
RT @RichardOsborne4: I'm so sick of reading weak questionnaire/PROM "validation papers" For 30+ years its been know that a qnr/PROM is *NOT…
RT @RichardOsborne4: I'm so sick of reading weak questionnaire/PROM "validation papers" For 30+ years its been know that a qnr/PROM is *NOT…
RT @RichardOsborne4: I'm so sick of reading weak questionnaire/PROM "validation papers" For 30+ years its been know that a qnr/PROM is *NOT…
RT @RichardOsborne4: I'm so sick of reading weak questionnaire/PROM "validation papers" For 30+ years its been know that a qnr/PROM is *NOT…
RT @RichardOsborne4: I'm so sick of reading weak questionnaire/PROM "validation papers" For 30+ years its been know that a qnr/PROM is *NOT…
RT @RichardOsborne4: I'm so sick of reading weak questionnaire/PROM "validation papers" For 30+ years its been know that a qnr/PROM is *NOT…
RT @RichardOsborne4: I'm so sick of reading weak questionnaire/PROM "validation papers" For 30+ years its been know that a qnr/PROM is *NOT…
May be of interest @c_apfelbacher https://t.co/Zq2kIjBNCa
RT @RichardOsborne4: I'm so sick of reading weak questionnaire/PROM "validation papers" For 30+ years its been know that a qnr/PROM is *NOT…
RT @RichardOsborne4: I'm so sick of reading weak questionnaire/PROM "validation papers" For 30+ years its been know that a qnr/PROM is *NOT…
RT @RichardOsborne4: I'm so sick of reading weak questionnaire/PROM "validation papers" For 30+ years its been know that a qnr/PROM is *NOT…
I'm so sick of reading weak questionnaire/PROM "validation papers" For 30+ years its been know that a qnr/PROM is *NOT* validated, its the data it generates that gets validated. Heres why & how https://t.co/nJiH3Qp0Xr Needs Quant + Qual/Is a process,
RT @SpringerPBH: .#openaccess : Application of validity theory and #methodology to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): building an a…
.#openaccess : Application of validity theory and #methodology to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): building an argument for validity, in Special Section of new Quality of Life Research @ISOQOL #QLR @QoL https://t.co/fu2tVeGynT
RT @RichardOsborne4: Valuable qualitative research on #HealthLiteracy conceptualisation https://t.co/HkI5plcNdT there isnt enough of this d…
RT @RichardOsborne4: Valuable qualitative research on #HealthLiteracy conceptualisation https://t.co/HkI5plcNdT there isnt enough of this d…
RT @RichardOsborne4: Valuable qualitative research on #HealthLiteracy conceptualisation https://t.co/HkI5plcNdT there isnt enough of this d…
RT @RichardOsborne4: Valuable qualitative research on #HealthLiteracy conceptualisation https://t.co/HkI5plcNdT there isnt enough of this d…
RT @RichardOsborne4: Valuable qualitative research on #HealthLiteracy conceptualisation https://t.co/HkI5plcNdT there isnt enough of this d…
Valuable qualitative research on #HealthLiteracy conceptualisation https://t.co/HkI5plcNdT there isnt enough of this done. Confirmatory Quant work only can obscure problems. Even our HLQ tool isnt at all perfect in the setting it was designed https://t.co/
Important new paper on why PROM/PREM research needs #qualitative validation and not merely psychometric number-crunching. From @RichardOsborne4 https://t.co/0DNzcFJbHC
RT @trishgreenhalgh: Important new paper on why PROM/PREM research needs qualitative validation and not merely psychometric number-crunchin…
RT @Lucy_Selman: Always amazes me when people forget questionnaire validity is not a cut-and-dried, yes-or-no question... or assume that te…
@regalexa @CRG_FIDD Great. PROMS can make major decisions about people's lives... you really must understand if those decisions a robust... you can rely on (often) weak and (often) blind guidance from psychometrics. https://t.co/orprCGmCSc
RT @gerganakoleva: Important new paper casts light on a key gap in PROMs research: the extent to which real-world qualitative evidence supp…
@jjagnoor80 oh no, please read the paper. HRQoL tools dont get valided... its the data, in particular contexts, for particular purposes, that gets validated. https://t.co/orprCGmCSc
RT @Lucy_Selman: Always amazes me when people forget questionnaire validity is not a cut-and-dried, yes-or-no question... or assume that te…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: Important new paper on why PROM/PREM research needs qualitative validation and not merely psychometric number-crunchin…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: Important new paper on why PROM/PREM research needs qualitative validation and not merely psychometric number-crunchin…
RT @Lucy_Selman: Always amazes me when people forget questionnaire validity is not a cut-and-dried, yes-or-no question... or assume that te…
Always amazes me when people forget questionnaire validity is not a cut-and-dried, yes-or-no question... or assume that testing validity can be done without considering interpretation and meaning... https://t.co/qePquNaCya
RT @trishgreenhalgh: Important new paper on why PROM/PREM research needs qualitative validation and not merely psychometric number-crunchin…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: Important new paper on why PROM/PREM research needs qualitative validation and not merely psychometric number-crunchin…
Indeed, the ongoing discussion with colleagues on value of validated HRQol tools across contexts. https://t.co/RmUBMYgaKQ
RT @trishgreenhalgh: Important new paper on why PROM/PREM research needs qualitative validation and not merely psychometric number-crunchin…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: Important new paper on why PROM/PREM research needs qualitative validation and not merely psychometric number-crunchin…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: Important new paper on why PROM/PREM research needs qualitative validation and not merely psychometric number-crunchin…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: Important new paper on why PROM/PREM research needs qualitative validation and not merely psychometric number-crunchin…