↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Causes and Control, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Published in
Cancer Causes and Control, January 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1008925301459
Authors

Stephen A. Cann, Johannes P. van Netten, Christiaan van Netten

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 8 18%
Researcher 8 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 12 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 11%
Unspecified 3 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 5%
Other 8 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2014.
All research outputs
#2,122,368
of 12,319,220 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes and Control
#356
of 1,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,637
of 266,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes and Control
#10
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,319,220 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,515 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.