Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, February 2018
Charles Dziuban, Charles R. Graham, Patsy D. Moskal, Anders Norberg, Nicole Sicilia
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||72||80%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||5||6%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||1||1%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,423 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||270||11%|
|Student > Bachelor||166||7%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||140||6%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||107||4%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Arts and Humanities||131||5%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 119. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,520,187 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
of 412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 483,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,520,187 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 483,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.