↓ Skip to main content

Optimization of Culture Conditions for Mass Production of the Probiotics Pseudomonas MCCB 102 and 103 Antagonistic to Pathogenic Vibrios in Aquaculture

Overview of attention for article published in Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Optimization of Culture Conditions for Mass Production of the Probiotics Pseudomonas MCCB 102 and 103 Antagonistic to Pathogenic Vibrios in Aquaculture
Published in
Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12602-015-9185-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Preetha, K. K. Vijayan, N. S. Jayapraksh, S. V. Alavandi, T. C. Santiago, I. S. Bright Singh

Abstract

Rapid growth of shrimp farming industry is affected by the recurrence of diverse diseases, among which vibriosis is predominant. Eco-friendly disease management strategy by the application of antagonistic probiotics is widely accepted. In the present study, culture conditions of antagonistic probiotics, Pseudomonas MCCB 102 and 103, were optimized to enhance their biomass production and antagonistic activity against the shrimp pathogen V. harveyi MCCB 111. Primarily, one-dimensional screening was carried out to fix the optimum range of sodium chloride concentration, pH and temperature. The second step optimization was done using a full-factorial central composite design of response surface methodology. As per the model, 12.9 g/L sodium chloride and pH 6.5 for Pseudomonas MCCB 102, and 5 g/L sodium chloride and pH 7 for Pseudomonas MCCB 103 were found to be ideal to maximize antagonistic activity. However, optimum temperature was the same (25 °C) for both isolates. Finally, the models were experimentally validated for enhanced biomass production and antagonistic activity. The optima for biomass and antagonistic activity were more or less the same, suggesting the possible influence of biomass on antagonistic activity.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 5%
United Kingdom 1 5%
Unknown 18 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 4 20%
Researcher 3 15%
Other 3 15%
Lecturer 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Other 6 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 50%
Environmental Science 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Sports and Recreations 2 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 5%
Other 3 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2015.
All research outputs
#11,586,063
of 13,040,367 outputs
Outputs from Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins
#168
of 224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,546
of 275,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,040,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.