↓ Skip to main content

Pupil dilation as an index of effort in cognitive control tasks: A review

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
41 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
518 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
770 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Pupil dilation as an index of effort in cognitive control tasks: A review
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, February 2018
DOI 10.3758/s13423-018-1432-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pauline van der Wel, Henk van Steenbergen

Abstract

Pupillometry research has experienced an enormous revival in the last two decades. Here we briefly review the surge of recent studies on task-evoked pupil dilation in the context of cognitive control tasks with the primary aim being to evaluate the feasibility of using pupil dilation as an index of effort exertion, rather than task demand or difficulty. Our review shows that across the three cognitive control domains of updating, switching, and inhibition, increases in task demands typically leads to increases in pupil dilation. Studies show a diverging pattern with respect to the relationship between pupil dilation and performance and we show how an effort account of pupil dilation can provide an explanation of these findings. We also discuss future directions to further corroborate this account in the context of recent theories on cognitive control and effort and their potential neurobiological substrates.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 770 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 770 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 153 20%
Student > Master 114 15%
Researcher 104 14%
Student > Bachelor 53 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 47 6%
Other 115 15%
Unknown 184 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 219 28%
Neuroscience 105 14%
Engineering 40 5%
Computer Science 26 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 3%
Other 129 17%
Unknown 225 29%