↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Virus Genes, January 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
235 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
Title
Published in
Virus Genes, January 2003
DOI 10.1023/a:1024455415443
Authors

Robert Gifford, Michael Tristem

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 198 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 31%
Researcher 47 22%
Student > Bachelor 28 13%
Student > Master 26 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 5%
Other 39 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 132 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 7%
Unspecified 13 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 2%
Other 15 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,894,386
of 13,165,892 outputs
Outputs from Virus Genes
#103
of 720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,263
of 275,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virus Genes
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,165,892 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 720 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.