↓ Skip to main content

Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, March 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
542 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
Title
Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, March 1999
DOI 10.3758/bf03210812
Pubmed ID
Authors

William H. Batchelder, David M. Riefer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 2%
United Kingdom 4 2%
United States 4 2%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 203 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 25%
Student > Master 33 15%
Researcher 32 15%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 7%
Other 41 19%
Unknown 23 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 134 61%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Neuroscience 7 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 3%
Linguistics 5 2%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 36 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,575,753
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
#4
of 6 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,966
of 36,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one scored the same or higher as 2 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 36,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them