↓ Skip to main content

A survey of constructed wetlands for acid coal mine drainage treatment in the Eastern United States

Overview of attention for article published in Wetlands, December 1989
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
A survey of constructed wetlands for acid coal mine drainage treatment in the Eastern United States
Published in
Wetlands, December 1989
DOI 10.1007/bf03160750
Authors

R. Kelman Wieder

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 28 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Student > Master 4 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Other 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 13 43%
Engineering 5 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 13%
Unspecified 3 10%
Other 1 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#2,375,595
of 8,990,348 outputs
Outputs from Wetlands
#67
of 648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,051
of 104,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wetlands
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,990,348 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 60th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 648 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.