↓ Skip to main content

Reconstruction of sediment-transport pathways on a modern microtidal coast by a new grain-size trend analysis method

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Reconstruction of sediment-transport pathways on a modern microtidal coast by a new grain-size trend analysis method
Published in
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, February 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40645-018-0166-9
Authors

Shota Yamashita, Hajime Naruse, Takeshi Nakajo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Student > Master 3 17%
Lecturer 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 33%
Engineering 3 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2023.
All research outputs
#5,972,660
of 24,619,469 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#102
of 573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,633
of 449,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,619,469 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.