RT @DeanLeckey: I am delighted that my @SSHRC_CRSH-funded paper on judging and #cohabitation reform is officially published in @FLS_journal…
RT @DeanLeckey: I am delighted that my @SSHRC_CRSH-funded paper on judging and #cohabitation reform is officially published in @FLS_journal…
RT @DeanLeckey: I am delighted that my @SSHRC_CRSH-funded paper on judging and #cohabitation reform is officially published in @FLS_journal…
RT @DeanLeckey: I am delighted that my @SSHRC_CRSH-funded paper on judging and #cohabitation reform is officially published in @FLS_journal…
I am delighted that my @SSHRC_CRSH-funded paper on judging and #cohabitation reform is officially published in @FLS_journal. https://t.co/LpJfGPXjwj
RT @LAWMcGill: Once a legislature extends ancillary relief or marital sharing to conjugal cohabitants, how do judges decide which couples c…
RT @LAWMcGill: Once a legislature extends ancillary relief or marital sharing to conjugal cohabitants, how do judges decide which couples c…
RT @LAWMcGill: Once a legislature extends ancillary relief or marital sharing to conjugal cohabitants, how do judges decide which couples c…
Once a legislature extends ancillary relief or marital sharing to conjugal cohabitants, how do judges decide which couples come under the law? @DeanLeckey examines judicial views of cohabitation. https://t.co/34U2tktZrE https://t.co/SARVkHPTzR
RT @fletcher_ruth: You can read a free online version of @DeanLeckey’s work analysing judicial views of cohabitation here https://t.co/ZPlx…
RT @fletcher_ruth: You can read a free online version of @DeanLeckey’s work analysing judicial views of cohabitation here https://t.co/ZPlx…
RT @fletcher_ruth: You can read a free online version of @DeanLeckey’s work analysing judicial views of cohabitation here https://t.co/ZPlx…
RT @fletcher_ruth: You can read a free online version of @DeanLeckey’s work analysing judicial views of cohabitation here https://t.co/ZPlx…
RT @fletcher_ruth: You can read a free online version of @DeanLeckey’s work analysing judicial views of cohabitation here https://t.co/ZPlx…
You can read a free online version of @DeanLeckey’s work analysing judicial views of cohabitation here https://t.co/ZPlxP5dUAD #SharedIt #SpreadTheWord #Feminism https://t.co/8NsQ4WaP0b
RT @FLS_journal: New online: Leckey analyses Canadian #cohabitation decisions and finds that judges measure against an ideal of companionat…
RT @FLS_journal: New online: Leckey analyses Canadian #cohabitation decisions and finds that judges measure against an ideal of companionat…
RT @FLS_journal: New online: Leckey analyses Canadian #cohabitation decisions and finds that judges measure against an ideal of companionat…
RT @FLS_journal: New online: Leckey analyses Canadian #cohabitation decisions and finds that judges measure against an ideal of companionat…
New online: Leckey analyses Canadian #cohabitation decisions and finds that judges measure against an ideal of companionate marriage with class and gender overtones, or declare themselves open to a variety of relationships https://t.co/UUvOMFhbLZ
RT @FLS_journal: New online: @DeanLeckey analyses how judges assess whether someone is a spouse for the purposes of #cohabitation https://…
RT @DrSharonThomp: This is going straight on my reading list. A fascinating looking paper by @DeanLeckey on how Canadian judges decide whet…
RT @LAWMcGill: Judging in Marriage's Shadow: in new publication, @DeanLeckey examines how Canadian judges speak about cohabitation and deci…
RT @DrSharonThomp: This is going straight on my reading list. A fascinating looking paper by @DeanLeckey on how Canadian judges decide whet…
RT @FLS_journal: New online: @DeanLeckey analyses how judges assess whether someone is a spouse for the purposes of #cohabitation https://…
RT @FLS_journal: New online: @DeanLeckey analyses how judges assess whether someone is a spouse for the purposes of #cohabitation https://…
RT @DrSharonThomp: This is going straight on my reading list. A fascinating looking paper by @DeanLeckey on how Canadian judges decide whet…
RT @DrSharonThomp: This is going straight on my reading list. A fascinating looking paper by @DeanLeckey on how Canadian judges decide whet…
RT @LAWMcGill: Judging in Marriage's Shadow: in new publication, @DeanLeckey examines how Canadian judges speak about cohabitation and deci…
Judging in Marriage's Shadow: in new publication, @DeanLeckey examines how Canadian judges speak about cohabitation and decide whether cohabitants qualify as “spouses”, via @FLS_journal https://t.co/34U2tktZrE https://t.co/3uQ2NhvQsS
RT @DrSharonThomp: This is going straight on my reading list. A fascinating looking paper by @DeanLeckey on how Canadian judges decide whet…
RT @DrSharonThomp: This is going straight on my reading list. A fascinating looking paper by @DeanLeckey on how Canadian judges decide whet…
This is going straight on my reading list. A fascinating looking paper by @DeanLeckey on how Canadian judges decide whether cohabitants qualify as ‘spouses’ for the purposes of property sharing. https://t.co/ySoyMPOZ3c
I am grateful to @SSHRC_CRSH for funding my cohabitation project and to my superb @LAWMcGill research assistants from the past two summers. https://t.co/lLiZZQXElD
New online: @DeanLeckey analyses how judges assess whether someone is a spouse for the purposes of #cohabitation https://t.co/UUvOMFhbLZ