↓ Skip to main content

More robust evidence for the efficacy of lithium in the long-term treatment of bipolar disorder: should lithium (again) be recommended as the single preferred first-line treatment?

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Bipolar Disorders, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
More robust evidence for the efficacy of lithium in the long-term treatment of bipolar disorder: should lithium (again) be recommended as the single preferred first-line treatment?
Published in
International Journal of Bipolar Disorders, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40345-014-0017-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Willem A Nolen

Abstract

With two recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the efficacy of lithium compared to placebo and other treatment options, it can now be concluded that lithium is the only drug that has been shown efficacious in the prevention of any mood episodes, manic episodes and depressive episodes in randomised trials not enriched for prior response to and tolerance of lithium. It is argued that lithium should be recommended as the single preferred first-line drug in the long-term treatment of bipolar disorder.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 30%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 13%
Psychology 5 13%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 7 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2022.
All research outputs
#14,650,664
of 23,452,723 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Bipolar Disorders
#200
of 292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,756
of 356,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Bipolar Disorders
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,452,723 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.