↓ Skip to main content

Complete conversion of all typical glycosylated protopanaxatriol ginsenosides to aglycon protopanaxatriol by combined bacterial β-glycosidases

Overview of attention for article published in AMB Express, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Complete conversion of all typical glycosylated protopanaxatriol ginsenosides to aglycon protopanaxatriol by combined bacterial β-glycosidases
Published in
AMB Express, January 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13568-018-0543-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eun-Joo Yang, Tae-Hun Kim, Kyung-Chul Shin, Deok-Kun Oh

Abstract

Aglycon protopanaxatriol (APPT) has valuable pharmacological effects such as anti-inflammatory and anti-stress activities. However, the complete conversion of all typical glycosylated protopanaxatriol ginsenosides to APPT has not been achieved to date. β-Glycosidase from the hyperthermophilic bacterium Dictyoglomus turgidum (DT-bgl) hydrolyzes the glucose residues at C-6 and the inner glucose at C-20 in protopanaxatriol (PPT), but not the outer rhamnose residues at C-6. In contrast, β-glycosidase from the hyperthermophilic bacterium Pyrococcus furiosus (PF-bgl) hydrolyzes the outer rhamnose residue at C-6 but not the inner glucose residues at C-6 and C-20 in PPT. Thus, the combined use of DT-bgl and PF-bgl resulted in the complete the conversion of all typical glycosylated PPT ginsenosides, including R1, R2, Re, Rg1, Rg2, Rh1, Rf, F1, F3, and F5, to APPT. DT-bgl combined with PF-bgl completely hydrolyzed 1.0 mg ml-1 R1 and 1.0 mg ml-1 total PPT-type ginsenosides in Panax notoginseng root extract to 0.5 and 0.63 mg ml-1 APPT for 4 and 3 h, with molar conversions of 100% and productivities of 125 and 210 mg l-1 h-1, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of the complete conversion of all typical glycosylated PPT ginsenosides to APPT and the highest productivity of APPT obtained from ginseng extract achieved to date.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 70%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2018.
All research outputs
#15,489,831
of 23,018,998 outputs
Outputs from AMB Express
#447
of 1,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,062
of 441,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AMB Express
#15
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,018,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,241 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.