Title |
Comparison of coronary plaque, coronary artery calcification and major adverse cardiac events in Chinese outpatients with and without type 2 diabetes
|
---|---|
Published in |
SpringerPlus, September 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40064-016-3373-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lijie Zhu, Jingjing Liu, Chuanyu Gao, Wenli Zhao, Jing Que, Xianpei Wang, Datun Qi, Jun Liu, Wentao Xiao, Juanjuan Yan, Wentao Li, You Zhang, Honghui Yang |
Abstract |
Diabetes substantially increases the risk of cardiovascular disease (CAD) and is associated with an increased risk of CAD mortality. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in coronary artery plaque, coronary artery calcification (CAC) measured in outpatients with and without type 2 diabetes, and the occurrence rate of a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) throughout follow-up with the same patients. Five hundred eighty-eight outpatients with suspected CAD comprising 208 diabetic and 380 non-diabetic patients were enrolled in this study. Coronary artery plaque and CAC scores were detected and measured by dual-source computed tomography. The major MACE during the follow-up period (4.0-20 months) was recorded and its relationship to type 2 diabetes and CAC was investigated. The diabetes group had higher CAC scores in the left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary arteries and total CAC burden than the group without diabetes. The diabetes group had more diseased coronary segments and more obstructed vessels than the non-diabetes group. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that diabetes is positively associated with mixed coronary plaque and non-calcified plaque. All patients in the diabetes group and all patients with higher CACs in both groups had a higher incidence rate of MACEs. Patients with type 2 diabetes have a higher prevalence of obstructive CAD, higher CAC scores, and a higher incidence rate of MACEs than those without diabetes. Diabetes and higher CAC scores were the important predictors of the occurrence of MACEs throughout follow-up with patients. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 18% |
Researcher | 2 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 18% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 55% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 9% |
Computer Science | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 2 | 18% |